Combating poverty, deprivation and exclusion is not a matter of charity, and it does not depend on how rich a country is. By tackling poverty as a matter of human rights obligation, the world will have a better chance of abolishing this scourge in our lifetime. Poverty eradication is an achievable goal.

- Louise Arbour, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (2007)

This short animation about child poverty in Canada and British Columbia was created for First Call by Peter Romich of Diametric with music by James Andean.

The facts highlighted in the animation video and discussed below are a reminder that addressing child poverty and inequality is an urgent issue. Children are only young once. This is a call to action to all First Call partners, supporters and other champions for children to use this video and the BC Child Poverty Report Card to raise awareness in local communities and through face-to-face and virtual social networks about this continuing problem and what our governments can do about it – with our support.

First Call has been raising the alarm about the unacceptable levels of child poverty in BC for over a decade. Using the most recent statistics, BC’s child poverty rate is 10.4% - that’s 87,000 children living in poverty (Statistics Canada, After-Tax Low-Income Cut Off, 2008). This rate is even higher for certain vulnerable groups: children in female lone-parent families, in Aboriginal families, in recent immigrant families, in racialized or ‘visible minority’ families, and children with disabilities.

This is a serious problem because children who grow up in poverty are significantly more likely to experience a wide range of problems and poor developmental outcomes. Significant associations between poverty and children's immediate and long-term health, cognitive development, behavior problems, emotional well-being, and problems with school achievement have been studied. Poverty undermines children’s ability to reach their full potential. It also excludes them from participation in many activities, such as sports and arts, that other children and families take for granted.

Seven provincial and territorial governments – Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba and the Northwest Territories – have committed themselves to poverty reduction plans. Yet British Columbia, which has had the worst child poverty record of any province for seven consecutive, pre-recession years (2002-08), has no comprehensive plan for reducing poverty.

The vast majority of BC’s poor children live in families with some income from paid work, yet their earnings are not enough to lift them and their children out of poverty. In 2008, one third of them – 40,600 children – lived in families with at least one adult working full-time, full-year.
Despite our relative wealth, a UNICEF study ranks Canada ranks 17th out of 24 developed countries on measures of children’s material well-being¹. This is related to our high levels of income inequality and our underinvestment in critical early care and learning supports and services for young children.

The gap between the rich and poor in Canada and BC is widening. Between 1989 and 2008, the richest 10% of BC’s families with children saw an average gain in their annual income of $84,713 or an astonishing increase of about 52%. Meanwhile the bottom 40% saw their average annual income drop by more than 4%, or an average loss of $6,909².

Polls show most people in BC don’t realize our federal and provincial governments spend significantly less money to support families with young children than other developed nations. In fact, in one international study Canada is ranked as spending the least on young children’s services out of 14 developed countries. BC’s rate of investment is even lower.

We are also ranked last out of 19 countries on young children’s access to early childhood care and education programs³.

Respondents to a 2010 Angus Reid poll commissioned by YWCA Vancouver showed overwhelming public support in BC for more affordable, quality child care spaces, increased financial support for low income families and significant government spending to dramatically reduce the number of vulnerable children in BC4. Reducing levels of child poverty is one of the most effective ways to reduce vulnerability in children.

With elections likely happening this year at all levels, political leaders and candidates have an opportunity to respond to this overwhelming desire for action, and voters have an opportunity to choose politicians they think are most committed to making this happen.

Child and family poverty is a scourge and a shame in this province. For a list of proposed public policy solutions see Fact Sheet #8 in the First Call 2010 Child Poverty Report Card.

Footnotes:
1. UNICEF, Innocenti Report Card 2009 www.unicef.ca/portal/Secure/Community/502/WCM/Get%20Involved/Advocacy/RC9-%20Eng.pdf
2 . First Call: BC Child and Youth Advocacy Coalition, 2010 Child Poverty Report Card, www.firstcallbc.org/pdfs/EconomicEquality/3-reportCard2010.pdf
3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2006, Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care. Country Profiles.
4. YWCA Vancouver, 2010, "BC-wide pollings results show overwhelming support for significant spending on children at risk", www.ywcavan.org/content?id=1207